- Declassification of Records Concerning the Assassinations of President John F. Kennedy – The White House
- Declassified CIA Donald Heath memo: 104-10103-10024.pdf
- The President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection | National Archives
- On January 23, President Trump issued an Executive Order for a creation of a plan to release JFK files.
- Why do we need a plan to release the documents? This is concerning to JFK researchers.
- Under Biden’s ‘plan’, withheld JFK records wouldn’t be released until the 2040’s.
- Withheld JFK records are not limited to the collection of JFK files held by the archives.
- Larry wrote a letter to the White House Council, informing the council of the larger scope of JFK files.
- There are records not in the known JFK collection that should be searched for & disclosed.
- When the ARRB was shut down due to lack of Congress funding, several searches were underway.
- The ARRB entered an agreement with the CIA & National Archives to continue searching for files.
- The National Archives was responsible for supervising these searches, this ended with ARRB’s closure.
- Bobby Kennedy had taken records from the White House very shortly after JFK’s assassination.
- Could these files that Bobby removed from the Oval Office be related to Cuba?
- Before being shut down the ARRB had been negotiating with RFK’s family trust to release RFK’s files.
- The ARRB promised not to have Bobby’s files included in the ‘assassination’ files.
- Sheridan was RFK’s right hand man, working for NBC to undermine the Garrison investigation.
- When the ARRB requested Sheridan’s files from the JFK Library, the library sent the files to NBC.
- The ARRB tried to sue Walter Sheridan’s estate to try to get these records back. Case died with ARRB.
- In Carlos Marcello’s recorded conversations to cell mate & FBI agent, does he admit to guilt in murder?
- Why haven’t these recordings been heard? Where are the transcripts to review?
- Transcripts from another Marcello’s sting that were released caused confusion within the ARRB.
- The FBI announced they have mysteriously ‘discovered’ 2400 new JFK records? How is this possible?
- Larry’s court case against the National Archives exposed to him that the NSC has hijacked the process.
- Trump’s administration offered early retirement for CIA officials. Will new staff comply with release?
- President Trump just fired 150 people from the NSC. Will the changing of the guard make a difference?
- Remaining unreleased RFK files are mainly files from the LAPD & LA District Attorney.
- The RFK files are not beholden to any particular statute like the JFK Act.
- The are MLK files are in the possession of the federal government & local government in Memphis.
- Supposedly a plan was submitted for release of files on Feb. 7th, with coverage from WCAB radio.
- Statutes do not stipulate that files can’t be released until everyone mentioned in file is deceased.
- In efforts to stop records from being released, Congress denies requests if people are still living.
- We need someone representing the public interest involved in the release of the JFK files.
- There needs to be a public committee formed to help facilitate & supervise this entire process.
- Why does the National Security Council insist releasing JFK documents is AGAINST public interest?
- CIA officials conducted a private investigation into the Cuban exiles associated with the assassination.
- The JFK investigation isn’t just a historical event, current policies were created based on false events.
- To avoid FOIA requests, Hillary Clinton & others use private servers, apps etc. to communicate.
- Deed of Gifts & IRS tax records are not currently included in Trump’s Executive Order.
- The Manchester notes will not be released until 2067 under current legislation.
- We will see over the next couple of weeks if the JFK files will be released! Watch this carefully!
Part Two Guest: Author Ray McGinnis
Topics: Canadian Politics
- “Trudeau Liberals threaten Canadians’ right to protest as appeal moves through the court,” Feb 6, 2025.
- Trudeau’s Emergencies Act invocation was illegal and unconstitutional –
- Federal Court finds Emergencies Act invocation violated rights, was unreasonable
- Challenging the Government of Canada’s invocation of the Emergencies Act
- February 14th is the 3rd year anniversary for the Trudeau government enacting the Emergencies Act.
- After the Emergencies Act was evoked, Canadians had their bank accounts seized by Trudeau.
- Jeremiah Jost, Edward Cornell, Vincent Gircys, & Harold Ristau filed a civil lawsuit against the gov.
- The finding by the lower level court by Justice Mosley found the government acted unconstitutionally.
- There are legal requirements built into the Emergencies Act are to ensure it doesn’t get abused.
- None of the required four thresholds of the Emergencies Act were met.
- The RCMP did not request for the Emergencies Act to be enacted. There wasn’t a real threat.
- The Canadian Security & Intelligence Service did not feel there was a threat.
- The protests were peaceful, family friendly & nonviolent. Children & bouncy castles are not a threat.
- In Canada, Canadians have the right to have peaceful assembly.
- Within minutes of Justice Richard Mosley’s decision was immediately appealed by Trudeau’s lawyers.
- Spending more tax payer money, the government hired a private sector law firm.
- The people effected by the government’s actions, wanted the appeal to be dismissed. Waste of money.
- February 4-5th deliberations reveal the Cdn. gov enacted Emergencies Act with pressure from Biden.
- Biden’s White House administration wanted the border blockades to be resolved.
- Nathalie Drouin, Deputy Clerk of Privy Council admitted the EA implemented preemptively just in case.
- Trudeau’s government has appointed over 850 judges, with only about 960 judges in the whole country.
- Pierre Trudeau enacted the War Measures Act to suspend civil liberties in Oct. 1970 during FLQ crisis.
- The McDonald Commission from 1977-1981 was a federal commission created to investigate RCMP.
- Whatever the court ruling is this fall, it will directly effect the civil case & the rights of all Canadians.
- If the Court of Appeals votes in favour of the government, the government has full reign.
- Once the Emergency Act is invoked, the Government can push through illegal laws in Parliament.
- Alberta Covid Response Task Force recently released devastating findings.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download